Tuesday, December 26, 2017

Legal Battle: Team A vs Team B

Team A presented some 'facts'. Charges were found to be partially incorrect and were shot down by Team B as well as some neutral eye-witnesses. 

As per Team A, Team B has been making false allegations. That claim could not be verified.

As per Team A, Team B has been using unparliamentary language. Team B is found guilty.

As per Team B, Team A has always lied. That claim could not be verified.

As per Team B, Team A has always used Team B. That claim could not be verified.

As per neutral eye-witnesses, Team A could have avoided the situation.

-----------------------------------------------

Based on all the facts presented in the case, this self-appointed judge makes the following observations. 

  • Team A should avoid such situations
  • Team B should try not to overreact
  • If there is a dispute in future, Team A and B must try NOT to create a scene in front of others
  • Team A and B are rarely on the same page and are rarely cordial. They should steer clear of each other
  • Beyond this, the judge does not give a f**k!!!

No comments: