Tuesday, December 26, 2017
Legal Battle: Team A vs Team B
Team A presented some 'facts'. Charges were found to be partially incorrect and were shot down by Team B as well as some neutral eye-witnesses.
As per Team A, Team B has been making false allegations. That claim could not be verified.
As per Team A, Team B has been using unparliamentary language. Team B is found guilty.
As per Team B, Team A has always lied. That claim could not be verified.
As per Team B, Team A has always used Team B. That claim could not be verified.
As per neutral eye-witnesses, Team A could have avoided the situation.
-----------------------------------------------
Based on all the facts presented in the case, this self-appointed judge makes the following observations.
- Team A should avoid such situations
- Team B should try not to overreact
- If there is a dispute in future, Team A and B must try NOT to create a scene in front of others
- Team A and B are rarely on the same page and are rarely cordial. They should steer clear of each other
- Beyond this, the judge does not give a f**k!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)