Showing posts with label Cinema. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cinema. Show all posts

Saturday, January 24, 2026

Border 2: Nostalgia, Nationalism, and the Weight of Legacy


I watched Border 2 earlier today. I must admit that I was not particularly impressed by the trailer, and my reservations were many.

The first was the casting. Varun Dhawan and Ahan Shetty are, in my view, not among the strongest actors of their generation. In fact they do not even come remotely close, though I liked Varun in 'October' and 'Badlapur'. I feared that even if the movie and storyline was compelling, weak performances could dilute its impact. 

My second concern was more fundamental. I am not a big fan of sequels that are made to cash-on the success of the 'original'. This felt like one of those cases. Sunny Deol, after a long time, witnessed significant success with Gadar 2 (again, not even remotely as good as original Gadar) and he and everyone else wanted to use the opportunity. Border 2 made a lot of sense and they went for it. Whether it would translate into a good cinematic product was uncertain.

The third concern was Sunny Deol himself. At 68, playing a Lieutenant Colonel is not easy to pull off convincingly. I had no doubt about his ability to bring intensity and emotional energy to the role - few can do that better - but age is a reality, especially when portraying a serving combat officer.

Despite all this, there was one thing I was absolutely certain about: I would watch Border 2, and I would watch it on the big screen.

When the original Border released in 1997, I was seventeen. I grew up in army cantonments, surrounded by officers and army kids, and I wanted to join the army myself. I watched Border on 'First Day, First Show' - and then again the second day first show, and the third day first show. Seems I used to be quite busy in afternoons and evenings!! 

The film was not cinematic genius, but it was raw, energetic, unapologetically patriotic, and full of Pakistan-bashing. 

Also, this was before multiplexes became the norm. Watching a film like Border in a single-screen theatre in a small town was a completely different experience. The audience whistled, clapped, shouted slogans, hurled abuses at Pakistan, and roared “Bharat Mata ki Jai” It was electric - comparable to watching a limited-overs cricket match at Eden Gardens (Kolkata) or Chinnaswamy (Bengaluru) or Chepauk (Chennai). In contrast, watching such films in multiplexes today feels like watching Test cricket at Lord’s. Audience is civilized and restrained and atmosphere is quite.....dead. Later, I watched Border for the fourth time on the big screen, and the experience was particularly special as it was in a military theatre, surrounded by an army unit.  

Out of respect for that legacy, I wanted to experience Border 2 in a theatre, regardless of my initial disappointment with the trailer.

So, how was the experience?

The film is not for purists. It takes several creative liberties in order to further glorify the soldiers and heighten dramatic effect. It is inspired by real incidents and real heroes, but not all portrayals are historically precise. 

  • Sunny Deol plays Lt. Col. Fateh Singh Kler - a fictional character believed to be inspired by Brigadier Hardev Singh Kler, MVC, who later retired as a Major General. 
  • Diljit Dosanjh portrays Flying Officer Nirmal Jit Singh Sekhon, PVC (1945-1971), whose story was one of the primary reasons I wanted to watch the movie. Sekhon is a towering inspiration. As I have mentioned in an earlier blog, while I deeply admire all military heroes - especially gallantry award recipients - Flying Officer Nirmal Jit Singh Sekhon is one of the three I find particularly remarkable. Flying Officer Sekhon attained martyrdom on 14 December 1971 while defending Indian airspace during the Indo-Pak War. He was posthumously awarded the Param Vir Chakra, India’s highest gallantry award, and remains the only officer of the Indian Air Force to have received this honour. Confronted with overwhelming odds, Sekhon displayed exceptional courage and composure, choosing to engage the enemy rather than withdraw. In a lone defensive action, he disrupted and repelled a Pakistan Air Force attack, forcing multiple enemy Sabre aircraft to disengage. His determined resistance significantly blunted the assault and safeguarded vital assets. Sekhon's extraordinary courage and flying skills earned him praise even from the opposing side. The PAF pilot who eventually shot him down, Salim Baig Mirza, is reported to have later praised his opponent's valor in an article, leading to the expression, "some enemies are also respectable".
  • Varun Dhawan plays Major Hoshiar Singh Dahiya, PVC (1936-1998). Major Hoshiar Singh was my father’s instructor in 1975 at the Indian Military Academy (Dehradun) and later retired as a Colonel. He is celebrated for his extraordinary bravery and leadership during the 1971 Indo-Pak War, notably in the Battle of Jarpal. He captured a heavily fortified enemy position and, despite severe injuries, successfully repelled multiple counter-attacks. Leading from the front and refusing evacuation until the ceasefire, he inspired his troops to victory and inflicted heavy casualties on the enemy. His valor earned him the Param Vir Chakra, cementing his legacy as a legendary war hero.
  • Ahan Shetty essays the role of Lieutenant Commander Mahender Singh Rawat, inspired by Captain Mahendra Nath Mulla, MVC (1926-1971), who was posthumously awarded the Maha Vir Chakra, India's second-highest wartime gallantry award. Captain Mulla displayed exceptional bravery during the 1971 Indo-Pak War as commanding officer of INS Khukri. When the ship was fatally damaged, he refused to abandon it, ensuring the safety of his crew first. He went down with his ship, exemplifying supreme leadership, sacrifice, and devotion to duty.



Yes, several scenes are fictionalized and inconsistent with strict military history. Did that spoil the movie? No, I enjoyed it.

Yes, the war sequences are lengthy, but understandably so. The filmmakers wanted to showcase the heroism of multiple military icons, and that demands screen time. Performances across the board are commendable - including those of Varun Dhawan and Ahan Shetty, who pleasantly surprised me. The makers ensured several connections - in terms of character names, dialogues, songs - with the original Border and I particularly enjoyed those parts. 


Some scenes were quite emotional, even tear-jerking. Perhaps they may not affect everyone the same way, but having seen the lives of military personnel up close, many moments resonated deeply with me. To my embarrassment, the tears did not go unnoticed - my wife on my right and a dear friend on my left both saw them. My wife even handed me a tissue, making matters worse! Its okay, grown men are allowed to cry - secretly, in a dark theatre, hoping to go unnoticed.

Overall, Border 2 is not a brilliant film. It is lengthy, and takes more than a few creative liberties. Yet, it deserves to be watched. It makes a sincere effort to bring to the mainstream audience the stories of several military heroes - some of whom are not widely known outside defence circles. For that intent alone, the film deserves appreciation. It may not match both - the Indian military history as well as the legacy of the original Border - but it respectfully salutes it. Sometimes, that is reason enough.

Thursday, May 12, 2022

Movies: Michelin Star Dishes or McDonald's Burger?



There is an 'unnecessary' controversy that has been created over 'Indian' cinema and the 'National' language. Various actors and/or publicity-seekers are jumping into the dialogue. Some Hindi movie actors said that 'Hindi' is the national language and some South Indian actors said that Hindi movies are not the only ones that qualify as 'Pan-Indian' cinema as movies in South Indian languages are finding viewers across the globe now. 

As I mentioned at the very beginning, it is an unnecessary controversy and both sides should have refrained from getting into a social-media war. Lets look at what has been discussed;

Hindi is the 'National' language

That is incorrect. I do not blame the people who believe that as we were either taught that or were made to believe that. Hindi is the official language (along with English). Though I do believe that all Indians should know (and should be 'encouraged' to know) Hindi as that would help in communication across India but then, no one should be compelled to learn the language. India being such a diverse country, it is difficult to make that change happen in near future. If at all this happens, it can happen only through people initiative. It has been working so far and there is no 'need' for any change.

Hindi Movies Get More Importance

Now, lets come to the other side of the debate, which drove me to write this blog. Its about the 'Indian' cinema. Some South-Indian actors indicated that whenever 'Indian' cinema is discussed, represented or recognized, it is the Hindi cinema or 'Bollywood', which is taken into consideration. 

I am not sure if that is genuinely the case. While it may not be 'the' justification, lets look at the list of past winners of National Award for Best Feature Film

Since 1953, only 12 'pure-play' Hindi movies have won the National award. It excludes 'Ship of Theseus' (Hindi and English) and 'Court' (Marathi, Hindi, Gujarati and English). During the same period, 22 Bangla/Bengali, 12 Malayalam, 6 Kannada, 4 Marathi, 2 Tamil and 1 Telugu movies won awards. So, it may be unfair to say that only Hindi movies are being recognized. I agree that Hindi movies and movie stars get more media-attention and headlines. However, that is because Hindi movies are watched by a larger audience and includes some mega-stars. However, there is no biasedness or partiality as such. 

South-Indian cinema also has several mega-stars including Rajnikanth, Chiranjeevi, Mammootty, Mohanlal but except Thalaiva, others have not managed to create a significant fan-base or gain popularity outside India or their region. Of course, this is a comparative statement. I am not at all suggesting that Chiranjeevi is not popular. However, he probably is known to fewer people compared to say...Amitabh Bachchan, Shahrukh Khan, Aamir Khan, Salman Khan and Rajanikanth. It is a fact. This does not make Chiranjeevi a lesser actor. In fact, personally, I do not like most of the names mentioned above. In my opinion, list of best actors and most popular actors [in Indian context] seldom have common names. Among the current leading actors, I personally enjoy the work of Dhanush and Fahadh Faasil the most and I am not only talking about South Indian cinema!!

Which Movie Industry is Better?

Though it is not being said or discussed in as many words but the debate, comments and the arguments put forward seem to suggest that the 'stakeholders' want to comment on which movie industry [in India] is better!! This debate is again....unnecessary. 

If I talk about myself, I do not 'generally' enjoy Hindi movies but I end up watching a lot of them. Most of them are nonsensical formula-based movies. They do better (in terms of collections/returns/ROI) than the kind of movies I genuinely appreciate. Some of the popular South-Indian movies (RRR, KGF 1 & 2, Baahubali 1 & 2, Pushpa etc.) are also doing pretty well in terms of collections however it is important to understand that box-office collections do not necessarily mean cinematic brilliance [and vice versa]. 

If a movie is watched by more number of people, it does not necessarily become a great movie. Similarly, if a megastar is followed by a larger group of fans, it does not necessarily mean he/she is the best actor [or even a good actor]. McDonald's burger may be the most popular food item but is a McDonald's burger ever considered a great dish?? These days, almost every superhero movie sets the box office on fire but are they ever considered a genuine piece of art? 

In the field of art, popularity and sales volumes do not always mean brilliance. People watch nonsensical, formula-based masala movies because movies are watched with family and/or friends and people typically opt for pure-play entertainment for such events. For example, when I am watching a movie alone, I would watch something like 'The Lunchbox' but when I go to watch a movie with my 10-year old, I would end up watching 'Simbba' or 'Suryavanshi'. I watch a lot of movies - different genres and different languages (English, world cinema, Hindi, Malayalam, Telugu, Tamil....]. I look for good stories and good performances and do not restrict myself to a certain genre or language. However, for most people [even I select movies based on the mood], movies are a getaway from their regular, mundane life that is often filled with stress, depression, issues, burdens, frustration, anger. They do not want to see the protagonist go through similar emotions on-screen and would rather watch a nonsensical comedy/action!! They like to watch a hero that is larger than life...who can stand against villains, beat 100 people, romance, dance, make us laugh....and what not!! Such movies help the viewers come out of the theatre relaxed [not always though!!]. So both kind of movies are required. We need movies with a message, with a great story, with brilliant performances. At the same time, we need the nonsensical formula-based masala movies. 

We need the Michelin Star dishes but also the McDonald's burger!!!